Sims v. Cellco Partnership, No. 3:2007cv01510 - Document 90 (N.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 1, 2009. (Attachment: # 1 Exhibit 1)(mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2009)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Sims v. Cellco Partnership Doc. 90 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 MICHELLE SIMS, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly-situated individuals, 13 The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 18 Case No. 07-1510 MMC v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS, a Delaware general partnership., CLASS ACTION [SECOND PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Defendant. 19 20 21 22 23 24 [SECOND PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 25 26 27 28 [SECOND PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER CASE NO. C-07-1510 MMC Dockets.Justia.com 1 This matter came on for hearing on July 24, 2009, at 9:00 a.m. The Court has 2 considered the Stipulation of Settlement (“Stipulation”), the submissions by the parties in 3 support of the proposed settlement (including the Joint Submission Regarding Charitable 4 Distribution Pursuant To Settlement Agreement submitted by the parties subsequent to 5 the Final Approval Hearing), the record in the Action and the arguments and authorities 6 of counsel. Good cause appearing, 7 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS: 8 1. 9 10 The Court, for purposes of this Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal With Prejudice (“Judgment”), adopts the terms and definitions set forth in the Stipulation. 2. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Action, Plaintiff, 11 the Settlement Class Members, and defendant Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless 12 (“Verizon Wireless”). 13 3. The Court finds that the notice to the Settlement Class of the pendency of 14 the Action and of this settlement, as provided by the Stipulation and by an Order of this 15 Court dated February 18, 2009, constituted the best notice practicable under the 16 circumstances to all persons and entities within the definition of the Settlement Class, and 17 fully complied with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and due 18 process. 19 4. The Court approves the settlement as set forth in the Stipulation and finds 20 that the settlement is in all respects fair, reasonable, adequate and just to the Settlement 21 Class Members, and the Settling Parties are hereby directed to perform its terms, subject 22 to the terms of this Order. 23 5. Upon the Effective Date hereof and pursuant to the Stipulation, Verizon 24 Wireless shall do the following: 25 a. 26 Consideration to the Class Verizon Wireless will provide one million dollars ($1,000,000) to the Settlement 27 Class as further described below. 28 b. Refunds for Settlement Class Members 1 [SECOND PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER CASE NO. C-07-1510 MMC 1 Verizon Wireless shall refund to Settlement Class Members who filed claims with the 2 Settlement Administrator prior to August 15, 2009 the amount of fifteen dollars ($15). To the 3 extent that a Settlement Class Member previously received a partial credit or refund, Verizon 4 Wireless shall refund the amount for which the Settlement Class Member did not previously 5 receive a credit or refund, up to a maximum of $15 (“Refund Amount”). 6 The Refund Amount shall be provided as follows: (a) in the form of a credit on their 7 bill or, in the sole discretion of Verizon Wireless, in the form of a cash payment, for 8 Settlement Class Members who are current Subscribers; (b) in the form of a cash payment for 9 those Settlement Class Members who are former Subscribers and who are not delinquent on 10 their closed accounts for an amount in excess of $15; and (c) if a former Subscriber is 11 delinquent on his or her closed account, then that former Subscriber shall receive a credit on 12 the delinquent account in an amount equal to the Refund Amount that otherwise would have 13 been payable under the settlement or, in the sole discretion of Verizon Wireless, a cash 14 payment. Refunds or credits shall be issued within 60 days of the Effective Date. 15 The Settlement Administrator shall reject any claim that is fraudulent, invalid, 16 insufficient, incomplete or untimely. Verizon Wireless, in its sole discretion, may choose 17 to honor a claim or claims that would otherwise be rejected by the Settlement 18 Administrator. In the event that a claim is rejected, the Settlement Administrator will 19 notify the claimant and Lead Class Counsel of the rejection. Lead Class Counsel and 20 counsel for Verizon Wireless shall meet and confer regarding any disputed claims and 21 will attempt in good faith to resolve such disputes. In the event the Parties cannot resolve 22 the dispute, the Parties shall request the assistance of the Court. 23 c. Charitable Distribution 24 The difference between the amount of the total claims and one million dollars 25 ($1,000,000) (the “Remaining Funds”) shall be distributed in the form of cash distributions to 26 the following charities in the amounts listed below, subject to any minor adjustments that may 27 be necessary after the final amount of the Remaining Funds is determined: 28 2 [SECOND PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER CASE NO. C-07-1510 MMC 1 National Domestic Violence Hotline $300,225 Family Violence Prevention Fund $300,000 National Center for Victims of Crime $125,000 Break the Cycle $125,000 The Institute on Domestic Violence in the African American Community $120,000 Total 2 $970,225 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 The Court finds that such disposition is appropriate and gives its final approval to such charitable distribution. 6. The Court adjudges that the payment of attorneys’ fees and expenses in 11 the total amount of $283,980.70 to Class Counsel and the payment of an incentive award 12 to plaintiff Michelle Sims in the amount of $1,000 are fair, reasonable and adequate, and 13 that said attorneys’ fees and expenses shall be paid to Class Counsel and said incentive 14 award shall be paid to plaintiff Michele Sims pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation. 15 7. As of the Effective Date, Plaintiff and all Settlement Class Members shall 16 be forever barred and enjoined from filing, commencing, prosecuting, intervening in, or 17 participating (as class members or otherwise) in any capacity, in any action or proceeding 18 that involves or asserts any of the Released Claims against any Released Parties and shall 19 conclusively be deemed to have released and forever discharged the Released Parties 20 from all Released Claims. 21 8. Plaintiff and all Settlement Class Members shall, as of the Effective Date, 22 conclusively be deemed to have acknowledged that the Released Claims may include 23 claims, rights, demands, causes of action, liabilities, or suits that are not known or 24 suspected to exist as of the Effective Date. Plaintiff and all Settlement Class Members 25 nonetheless release all such Released Claims against the Released Parties. Further, as of 26 the Effective Date, Plaintiff and all Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have 27 28 3 [SECOND PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER CASE NO. C-07-1510 MMC 1 waived any and all protections, rights and benefits of California Civil Code section 1542 2 and any comparable statutory or common law provision of any other jurisdiction. 3 9. The benefits and payments described in Paragraphs 5 and 6 are the only 4 consideration, fees, and expenses Verizon Wireless or the Released Parties shall be 5 obligated to give to Plaintiff, Settlement Class Members, and Class Counsel in 6 connection with the Stipulation and the payment of attorneys’ fees and expenses. 7 10. The Action and all claims asserted in the Action are dismissed on the 8 merits and with prejudice as to Plaintiff and all Settlement Class Members. 9 Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Judgment does not dismiss any of the individual 10 claims asserted by any persons or entities who have validly and timely requested 11 exclusion from the Settlement Class as provided for in sections 6.2-6.3 of the Stipulation. 12 A list of persons and entities who validly and timely requested exclusion is attached 13 hereto as Exhibit 1. Notwithstanding the dismissal of the Action, Verizon Wireless shall 14 not claim and may not be awarded any costs, attorneys’ fees, or expenses. 15 11. Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, the Court 16 reserves exclusive and continuing jurisdiction over the Action, Plaintiff, the Settlement 17 Class Members, and Verizon Wireless for the purposes of supervising the 18 implementation, enforcement, construction, and interpretation of the Stipulation, the 19 Court’s Order dated February 18, 2009, and this Judgment. 20 12. Neither the Stipulation nor the Settlement contained therein, nor any act 21 performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of the Stipulation or the 22 Settlement: (a) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission, concession or 23 evidence of, the validity or invalidity of any Released Claims, the truth or falsity of any 24 fact alleged by Plaintiff, the sufficiency or deficiency of any defense that has been or 25 could have been asserted in the litigation, or of any alleged wrongdoing, liability, 26 negligence, fault of the Released Parties, or any of them; (b) is or may be deemed to be or 27 may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, any fault or misrepresentation or 28 omission with respect to any statement or written document attributed to, approved or 4 [SECOND PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER CASE NO. C-07-1510 MMC 1 made by any of the Released Parties, in any civil, criminal or administrative proceeding 2 in any court, administrative agency or other tribunal; (c) is or may be deemed to be or 3 shall be construed as or received in evidence as an admission or concession against the 4 Released Parties or Plaintiff, or each or any of them, that any of the Plaintiff’s claims is 5 with or without merit, or that the consideration to be given hereunder represents an 6 amount equal to, less than or greater than that amount which could have or would have 7 been recovered after trial. Any of the Released Parties or Plaintiff may file the 8 Stipulation and/or the Judgment in any action that may be brought against such party or 9 parties in order to support a defense or counterclaim based on principles of res judicata, 10 collateral estoppel, release, good faith settlement, judgment bar or reduction or any other 11 theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim, or in a 12 proceeding to consummate or enforce the Stipulation or Judgment, or as otherwise 13 required by law. 14 13. In the event that the Settlement does not become effective in accordance 15 with the terms of the Stipulation, this Judgment shall be rendered null and void to the 16 extent provided by and in accordance with the Stipulation and shall be vacated, and in 17 such event, all orders entered and releases delivered in connection herewith shall be null 18 and void to the extent provided by and in accordance with the Stipulation. 19 14. Without further approval from the Court, the Parties are authorized to 20 agree to and adopt such amendments, modifications and expansions of the Stipulation 21 and its implementing documents (including all exhibits to the Stipulation) as (a) shall be 22 consistent in all material respects with this Judgment, or (b) do not limit the rights of 23 Settlement Class Members. 24 25 26 27 28 5 [SECOND PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER CASE NO. C-07-1510 MMC 1 All other relief not expressly granted to the Settlement Class Members is denied. 2 3 4 October 1 Dated: __________________, 2009 By: Order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California 5 ______________________________ Hon. Maxine M. Chesney UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6 [SECOND PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER CASE NO. C-07-1510 MMC
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
