(HC) Taylor v. Kern State Prison, No. 2:2024cv01719 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2024)
Court Description: ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Sean C. Riordan on 10/25/2024 ORDERING the Clerk to assign a district judge to this case and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections to F&R due within 21 days. (Yin, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Taylor v. Kern State Prison Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT ANTHONY TAYLOR, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:24-cv-1719-SCR P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS KERN STATE PRISON, Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging his 18 January 2024 conviction which is currently on appeal to the California Court of Appeal. (ECF 19 No. 1.) Petitioner asserts delay in the appeal proceeding and other issues. (Id. at 1-2.) 20 A filing fee of $5.00 is required to commence a habeas corpus action in federal district 21 court. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). The court may authorize the commencement of an action “without 22 prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor, by a person who makes affidavit that he is 23 unable to pay such costs or give security therefor.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 24 In an order filed on September 3, 2024, petitioner was ordered to submit an affidavit in 25 support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. Petitioner was 26 cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 27 The time period granted has expired and petitioner has not paid the fee, filed the required 28 documents, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 For the reasons set forth above, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district judge to this case; and 3 IT IS RECOMMENDED this action be dismissed without prejudice. 4 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 5 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 21 days after 6 being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written objections 7 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 8 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that 9 failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 10 Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 11 DATED: October 25, 2024 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
