(PC) Mays v. Stanton Correctional Facility, No. 2:2023cv02339 - Document 9 (E.D. Cal. 2023)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/29/2023 REASSIGNING CASE to Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller, and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman as Magistrate Judge in this action. New Case Number: 2:23-CV-2339 KJM KJN P. FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller, and Objections due within 14 days after being served with these F & R's.(Reader, L)

Download PDF
(PC) Mays v. Stanton Correctional Facility Doc. 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SEAN TAYLOR MAYS, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:23-cv-2339 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS STANTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Defendant. 17 18 By order filed November 21, 2023, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and thirty days 19 leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have passed, and 20 plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 21 22 23 24 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 2 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 3 Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 Dated: December 29, 2023 5 6 7 8 /mays2339.fta 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.