(PC) Buckner v. Taylor et al, No. 2:2023cv02019 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 12/21/23 ADOPTING in full 6 Findings and Recommendations and DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 COURTNEY J. BUCKNER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:23-cv-2019 WBS KJN P v. ORDER ASHLEY TAYLOR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On November 21, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiff, and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff did not file 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 21, 2023, are adopted in full; and 2 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. 3 Dated: December 21, 2023 4 5 6 /buck23cv2019.800 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
