(PC) Abraria v. Murphy et al, No. 2:2023cv01625 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/03/2023 DIRECTING the Clerk to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. District Judge Dale A. Drozd and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire f or all further proceedings. It is further RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Dale A. Drozd. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. New Case Number: 2:23-cv-1625 DAD AC (PC) (Lopez, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Abraria v. Murphy et al Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGROY RALPH ABRARIA, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:23-cv-1625 AC P Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. BRYAN MURPHY, et al., Defendants. 16 17 By an order filed August 11, 2023, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma 18 pauperis application on the form provided by the court and was cautioned that failure to do so 19 would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 4. After plaintiff failed 20 to file a completed application, he was given an additional twenty-one days to file a new 21 application or submit a certified trust account statement and warned that failure to comply would 22 result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without further warning. ECF No. 5. 23 The twenty-one-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an application to proceed 24 in forma pauperis, paid the filing fee, or otherwise responded to the court’s orders. 25 26 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 27 IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 28 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 2 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 3 with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 4 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 5 time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 6 (9th Cir. 1991). 7 DATED: November 3, 2023 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
