(PC) Suggett v. Solano County Justice Center et al, No. 2:2023cv01353 - Document 17 (E.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/20/2; ADOPTING 12 Findings and Recommendations in full as follows: DISMISSING 1) all claims against Defendant Solano County Justice Center; 2) claims alleging Defendant Hagen disregarded Plaintif f's grievances and violated HIPPA; 3) HIPAA claim against Defendant Wellpath Medical; 4) claim alleging Defendant Hagen violated Plaintiff's right to adequate medical care when he found Plaintiff's grievances requesting Adderall unfo unded; 5) claim against Defendant Wellpath Medical for denial of Plaintiff's grievances requesting Adderall; and 6) claims against Defendant Pillay. This action WILL PROCEED on the following claims: (1) violation of Plaintiff's right to privacy against Defendants Wellpath Medical and Wong; and (2) violation of Plaintiff's right to adequate medical/mental health care against Defendants Wellpath Medical, Wong, Roesler, and Nevarez. (Benson, A.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Suggett v. Solano County Justice Center et al Doc. 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAYLA SUGGETT, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:23-cv-1353-TLN-KJN ORDER v. SOLANO COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a county prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 19 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 20 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On November 02, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 22 which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 23 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff did not file 24 objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported 25 26 by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 02, 2023 (ECF No. 12) are 3 ADOPTED IN FULL; and 4 2. The following claims raised in the original complaint (ECF No. 1) are DISMISSED: 5 1) all claims against Defendant Solano County Justice Center; 2) claims alleging 6 Defendant Hagen disregarded Plaintiff’s grievances and violated HIPPA; 3) HIPAA 7 claim against Defendant Wellpath Medical; 4) claim alleging Defendant Hagen 8 violated Plaintiff’s right to adequate medical care when he found Plaintiff’s grievances 9 requesting Adderall unfounded; 5) claim against Defendant Wellpath Medical for 10 denial of Plaintiff’s grievances requesting Adderall; and 6) claims against Defendant 11 Pillay. 12 3. This action will proceed on the following claims: (1) violation of Plaintiff’s right to 13 privacy against Defendants Wellpath Medical and Wong; and (2) violation of 14 Plaintiff’s right to adequate medical/mental health care against Defendants Wellpath 15 Medical, Wong, Roesler, and Nevarez. 16 Date: December 20, 2023 17 18 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
