(PC) Trammel v. Ramos et al, No. 2:2023cv01183 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2023)

Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 06/29/2023 DIRECTING the Clerk to assign a district judge to this case. District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes assigned for all further pr oceedings. It is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 30 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. New Case Number: 2:23-cv-1183 TLN DB (PC). (Spichka, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEMARION TRAMMEL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 No. 2:23-cv-1183 DB P ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. RAMOS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff’s complaint was filed in the 17 18 Northern District of California on June 20, 2023 and transferred to this court on June 23, 2023. 19 The court’s own records reveal that on June 9, 2023, plaintiff filed a complaint containing 20 virtually identical allegations against the same defendants. See Trammel v. Ramos, 2:23-cv-1111 21 AC P.1 Due to the duplicative nature of the present action, this court will recommend that the 22 complaint be dismissed. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign 23 24 a district judge to this case; and IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. 25 26 27 28 P. 41(b). 1 A court may take judicial notice of court records. See MGIC Indem. Co. v. Weisman, 803 F.2d 500, 505 (9th Cir. 1986); United States v. Wilson, 631 F.2d 118, 119 (9th Cir. 1980). 1 1 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the District Judge assigned to this 2 case pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty days after being served 3 with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. 4 The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 5 Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 6 may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 7 Cir. 1991). 8 Dated: June 29, 2023 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 DLB:9 DB prisoner inbox/civil rights/R/tram1183.23 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.