(PC) Singh v. Sacramento County Sheriff et al, No. 2:2023cv00237 - Document 15 (E.D. Cal. 2023)

Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/26/2023 DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to assign a district judge to this case, and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Chief Distric t Judge Kimberly J. Mueller and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman assigned for all further proceedings. Referred to Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. New Case Number: 2:23-cv-0237-KJM-KJN (PC). (Huang, H)

Download PDF
(PC) Singh v. Sacramento County Sheriff et al Doc. 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GURPREET SINGH, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. ORDER & FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., Defendants. 16 17 No. 2:23-cv-0237 KJN P By order filed May 18, 2023, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to 18 file an amended complaint was granted. Although plaintiff’s first copy of the order was returned, 19 the order was re-served on plaintiff at his new address on June 22, 2023. Thirty days from that 20 date have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the 21 court’s order. 22 23 24 25 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 28 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 2 and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen 3 days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 4 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 5 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 6 Dated: July 26, 2023 7 8 /sing0237.fta 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.