(HC) Weisner v. Allison, No. 2:2023cv00216 - Document 31 (E.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/03/2023 RECOMMENDING that the 30 Motion for Default Judgment be denied. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Spichka, K.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Weisner v. Allison Doc. 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRANKIE WEISNER, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:23-cv-0216 TLN CKD P v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS KATHLEEN ALLISON, 15 Respondent. 16 On May 8, 2023, petitioner filed a motion for entry of default judgment. That motion was 17 18 denied on June 21, 2023. The court explained to petitioner that respondent was not in default 19 because on March 1, 2023, the court ordered that respondent file a response to petitioner’s 20 petition for a writ of habeas corpus within 60 days, and respondent filed an answer on April 28, 21 2023. The court found petitioner’s motion for entry of default judgment frivolous, and petitioner 22 was warned that if he continued to file frivolous motions, sanctions - which might include 23 dismissal of this action - would issue. Despite the court’s warning, petitioner filed a second motion for entry of default. Again, 24 25 the motion is frivolous. The record reveals that respondent served a second copy of the answer 26 on petitioner on May 9, 2023, after the court and respondent were notified on May 1, 2023, that 27 petitioner’s address had changed. This was done as a courtesy to petitioner and is not a basis for 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 holding respondent in default as petitioner argues. Service of the answer on petitioner’s address 2 of record on April 28, 2023, was fully effective. 3 The court will not sanction petitioner as this point, but the court warns petitioner again 4 that if he continues to file frivolous motions sanctions may issue, and such sanctions might 5 include dismissal of this action. 6 7 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that petitioner’s motion for default judgment (ECF No. 30) be denied. 8 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 9 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 10 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 11 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 12 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations. Any response to the 13 objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 14 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 15 appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 16 Dated: August 3, 2023 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 1 weis0216.def(2) 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
