(PS) Seneka v. County of Yolo et al, No. 2:2023cv00124 - Document 41 (E.D. Cal. 2023)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/20/23 GRANTING 12 , 13 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , and 34 Motions to Dismiss and ADOPTING 40 Findings and Recommendations in full. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice because it is barred by the principles of res judicata. CASE CLOSED (Licea Chavez, V)

Download PDF
(PS) Seneka v. County of Yolo et al Doc. 41 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHANA SENEKA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:23-cv-00124 KJM AC (PS) v. ORDER COUNTY OF YOLO, a government entity; YOLO COUNTY CHILD WELFARE SERVICES, a government entity, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a 18 19 United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On October 10, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 20 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 24 25 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 26 de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 27 by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 10, 2023, are adopted in full; 5 2. The motions to dismiss at ECF No. 12, 13, 29, 30, 31, 32 and 34 are GRANTED and 6 this case is dismissed with prejudice because it is barred by the principles of res judicata. 7 DATED: December 20, 2023. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.