(PC) Watts v. Covello et al, No. 2:2022cv02311 - Document 13 (E.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 05/25/2023 DIRECTING the Clerk to randomly assign a district judge to this action. District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan assi gned for all further proceedings. It is hereby RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's claims against Covello and Holmes be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Daniel J. Calabretta. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. New Case Number: 2:22-cv-2311 DJC EFB (PC). (Spichka, K.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Watts v. Covello et al Doc. 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VERNELL WATTS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:22-cv-02311-EFB (PC) v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PATRICK COVELLO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis in an action 18 brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. As discussed in the concurrently issued screening order finding 19 service of the first amended complaint appropriate for defendants Garibay, Pierce, Tsushko, and 20 Vega, the first amended complaint names two additional defendants, Warden Patrick Covello and 21 Chief Deputy Warden Bryan Holmes. The court recommends that the claims against defendants 22 Covello and Holmes be dismissed without leave to amend because, despite an opportunity to 23 amend, plaintiff has again failed to allege that either of these defendants personally participated in 24 a violation of plaintiff’s rights and their roles as supervisors are not a basis for liability. See 25 Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir. 1989); see also Plumeau v. School Dist. # 40, 130 26 F.3d 432, 439 (9th Cir. 1997) (denial of leave to amend appropriate where further amendment 27 would be futile). 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. Further, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s claims against Covello and Holmes be dismissed without prejudice. 5 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 6 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 7 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 8 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 9 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 10 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. 11 Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 12 13 Dated: May 25, 2023. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
