(PS) Gaffney v. Barrow et al, No. 2:2022cv02251 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/4/2023 ADOPTING 6 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING 5 Second Amended Complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim. CASE CLOSED. (Huang, H)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Gaffney v. Barrow et al Doc. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TYSHAWN C. GAFFNEY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:22–cv–02251-TLN–CKD ORDER v. CORY BARROW, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c). 19 On June 30, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be 21 filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections. The Court reviewed the file and 22 finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate 23 judge’s analysis. 24 //// 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 2 1. The June 30, 2023 findings and recommendations (ECF No. 6) are ADOPTED IN 3 4 5 6 7 FULL; 2. The Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 5) is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim; and 3. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. Date: August 4, 2023 8 9 10 11 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
