(PC) Medina v. Amador Jail et al, No. 2:2022cv02136 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2023)

Court Description: ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 5/16/2023 ORDERING the Clerk to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this case; and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute, fai lure to comply with court orders, and failure to state a claim, for the reasons set forth in the order, and the Clerk be directed to close the case. Assigned and referred to Judge Daniel J. Calabretta; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTONIO MEDINA, 12 13 14 Case No. 2:22-cv-02136-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AMADOR JAIL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On April 7, 2023, I screened plaintiff’s amended complaint and notified him that it did not 18 state cognizable claims. ECF No. 11. I granted him thirty days to file an amended complaint or 19 advisement indicating his intent to stand by his current complaint, subject to a recommendation 20 that it be dismissed. I also warned him that failure to comply with the April 7 order may result in 21 dismissal of this action. Id. at 3. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The deadline has passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the April 7, 2023 order.1 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall randomly assign a United States District Judge to this case. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of April 7 order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 1 1 1 Further, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that: 2 1. This action be dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, 3 and failure to state a claim, for the reasons set forth in the order. 4 2. The Clerk of Court be directed to close the case. 5 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 6 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 7 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 8 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 9 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 10 objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 11 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 12 appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 13 v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 Dated: May 16, 2023 17 JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.