(PC) Roberts v. CSP Sacramento et al, No. 2:2022cv02102 - Document 11 (E.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/10/2023 ADOPTING 10 The Findings and Recommendations in full. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Roberts v. CSP Sacramento et al Doc. 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID NATHANIEL ROBERTS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:22-cv-02102-TLN-EFB ORDER v. CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON, SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 17, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 3 ORDERED that: 4 5 6 7 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 17, 2023 (ECF No. 10), are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. DATE: May 10, 2023 8 9 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
