(PS) Tran v. Sapien et al, No. 2:2022cv02078 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 05/12/23 ADOPTING 5 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Licea Chavez, V)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CORRINA TRAN, No. 2:22-cv-02078-DJC-EFB (PS) Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 SAPIEN, et al., ORDER Defendants. 15 16 17 On March 23, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 18 herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections 19 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No 20 objections were filed. 21 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 22 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law 23 are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) 24 (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the 25 district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds 26 the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper 27 analysis. 28 /// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed March 23, 2023, are ADOPTED; and; 3 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 9 Dated: May 12, 2023 Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
