(PC) Windham v. Pike et al, No. 2:2022cv02007 - Document 17 (E.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/4/2023 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley, and Objections due within 14 days after being served with these F & R's.(Reader, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Windham v. Pike et al Doc. 17 Case 2:22-cv-02007-TLN-KJN Document 17 Filed 01/05/23 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES WINDHAM, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:22-cv-2007 TLN KJN P v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS MICHAEL PIKE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 By order filed November 21, 2022, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days 17 18 leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have passed, and 19 plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 20 21 prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 23 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 24 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 25 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 26 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 27 //// 28 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:22-cv-02007-TLN-KJN Document 17 Filed 01/05/23 Page 2 of 2 1 failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 2 Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 Dated: January 4, 2023 4 5 6 /wind2007.fta 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
