(PS) Nelson-Rogers v. JP Morgan Chase, N.A. et al, No. 2:2022cv01954 - Document 19 (E.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 05/10/2023 ADOPTING 17 Findings and Recommendations in full; DISMISSING 7 First Amended Complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. CASE CLOSED. (Rodriguez, E)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Nelson-Rogers v. JP Morgan Chase, N.A. et al Doc. 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARY ALICE NELSON ROGERS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:22-cv-01954-TLN-CKD ORDER v. JP MORGAN CHASE, N.A., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States 17 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c). On March 27, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 19 20 which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were 21 to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections. The Court has reviewed the file de 22 novo and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the 23 magistrate judge’s analysis. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The March 27, 2023 findings and recommendations (ECF No. 17) are ADOPTED IN 4 5 6 7 8 FULL; 2. The First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 7) is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted; and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. DATE: May 10, 2023 9 10 11 12 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
