(HC) Bontemps v. Merchant, No. 2:2022cv01741 - Document 19 (E.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/11/2023 ADOPTING 16 The Findings and Recommendations in full; GRANTING 12 Motion to Dismiss. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and The court DECLINES to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Bontemps v. Merchant Doc. 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGORY C. BONTEMPS, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 15 No. 2:22-cv-1741-TLN-KJN ORDER v. JOHN MERCHANT, Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On April 21, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On May 08, 2023, 23 petitioner was granted a 30 day extension of time to file objections. Neither party filed objections 24 to the findings and recommendations. 25 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 26 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 27 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The Court has 28 reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 21, 2023 (ECF No. 16) are ADOPTED 4 IN FULL; 5 2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No 12) is GRANTED; 6 3. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 7 4. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. 8 § 2253. 9 Dated: July 11, 2023 10 _____________________________________ 11 12 13 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
