(PC) Arrant v. Sacramento County Jail, No. 2:2022cv01229 - Document 14 (E.D. Cal. 2023)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 02/13/23 ADOPTING 13 Findings and Recommendations in full. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, due to plaintiff's failure to prosecute this action. CASE CLOSED(Licea Chavez, V)

Download PDF
(PC) Arrant v. Sacramento County Jail Doc. 14 Case 2:22-cv-01229-DAD-KJN Document 14 Filed 02/14/23 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LARRY WINN ARRANT, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, Defendant. No. 2:22-cv-01229-DAD-KJN (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING THIS ACTION (Doc. No. 13) 16 17 Plaintiff Larry Winn Arrant is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On December 13, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and 21 recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, due to 22 plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action. (Doc. No. 13.) The pending findings and 23 recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were 24 to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (Id. at 2.) To date, no objections to the 25 findings and recommendations have been filed, and the time in which to do so has now passed. 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a 27 de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court concludes that the 28 findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:22-cv-01229-DAD-KJN Document 14 Filed 02/14/23 Page 2 of 2 1 Accordingly: 2 1. 3 The findings and recommendations issued on December 13, 2022 (Doc. No. 13) are adopted in full; 4 2. 5 This action is dismissed, without prejudice, due to plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action; and 6 3. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. February 13, 2023 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.