(PC) Barela v. Stockton Police Department, No. 2:2022cv01209 - Document 11 (E.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 05/10/2023 ADOPTING 10 Findings and Recommendations in full; This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Rodriguez, E)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Barela v. Stockton Police Department Doc. 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 OSCAR BARELA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:22-cv-01209-TLN-DB ORDER v. STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 19 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 20 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 27, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 22 which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 23 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 24 objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 26 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 27 ORDERED that: 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 27, 2023, are ADOPTED IN FULL; 2 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 3 4 5 41(b); and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. DATE: May 10, 2023 6 7 8 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
