(PC) Foster v. Ramirez, No. 2:2022cv01064 - Document 8 (E.D. Cal. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 11/18/22 ADOPTING in full 7 Findings and Recommendations and DISMISSING without prejudice for lack of prosecution. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEEARL FOSTER, 12 13 14 No. 2:22-cv-1064 WBS AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ALDANA RAMIREZ, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking 18 relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On August 18, 2022, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff has 23 not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and 25 recommendations was returned to the court on September 6, 2022, plaintiff was properly served. 26 It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. 27 Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully 28 effective. 1 1 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 3 ORDERED that: 4 5 6 7 1. The findings and recommendations issued August 18, 2022 (ECF No. 7), are ADOPTED in full, and 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of prosecution.. Dated: November 18, 2022 8 9 10 11 12 13 fost1064.802 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
