(PC) Dixon v. Marlette et al, No. 2:2022cv00930 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/4/2022 ADOPTING 5 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Perdue, C.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MITCHELL DIXON, JR., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:22-CV-930-WBS-DMC-P v. ORDER MARLETTE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 17 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 Eastern District of California local rules. On July 25, 2022, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections 22 within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been 23 filed. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 25, 2022, are adopted in full; 3 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution and 4 5 6 failure to comply with court rules and orders; and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. Dated: October 4, 2022 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
