(PC) Brackett v. Garland et al, No. 2:2022cv00886 - Document 10 (E.D. Cal. 2022)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/21/2022 ADOPTING 8 Findings and Recommendations in Full. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Perdue, C.)

Download PDF
(PC) Brackett v. Garland et al Doc. 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEMOND CHARLES BRACKETT, 12 No. 2:22-cv-00886-TLN-EFB Plaintiff, 13 ORDER v. 14 MERRICK GARLAND, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking 17 18 relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 6, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 21 were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff has not filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations.1 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 26 Error! Main Document Only.Although it appears from the file that Plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations may have been returned, Plaintiff was properly served. It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the Court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 1 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed July 6, 2022 (ECF No. 8) are ADOPTED in 3 4 5 full; 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. DATED: September 21, 2022 6 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.