(PS) Snow v. Department of Justice et al, No. 2:2022cv00458 - Document 4 (E.D. Cal. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 05/20/20 ADOPTING 3 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING the complaint with prejudice for lack of federal jurisdiction.(Licea Chavez, V)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Snow v. Department of Justice et al Doc. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AARON JOSEPH SNOW, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:22-cv-00458-TLN -AC ORDER v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On March 16, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 21 findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty one days. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff 22 has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 Although it appears from the file that Plaintiff’s copy of the findings and 24 recommendations was returned, Plaintiff was properly served. It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to 25 keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service 26 of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 27 28 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 ORDERED that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed March 16, 2022, (ECF No. 3), are adopted in full; and 2. The Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 5 1951(e)(2) for lack of federal jurisdiction. 6 DATED: May 20, 2022 7 8 9 10 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
