(PC)Price v. Sacramento County et al, No. 2:2021cv02309 - Document 16 (E.D. Cal. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/6/22 ADOPTING in full 13 Findings and Recommendations and DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED(Kastilahn, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC)Price v. Sacramento County et al Doc. 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SCOTT RICHARD PRICE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. No. 2:21-cv-2309-JAM-EFB P ORDER ANN MARIE SCHUBERT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking 17 18 relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On March 9, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Despite being granted an extension 23 of time, plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 9, 2022, are adopted in full; and 3 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. 4 5 6 7 Dated: June 6, 2022 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
