(PC) Brackett v. Anderson et al, No. 2:2021cv02282 - Document 60 (E.D. Cal. 2023)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/21/2023 ADOPTING 47 Findings and Recommendations in full. All other claims and defendants are DISMISSED without leave to amend for failure to state a viable claim. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Perdue, C.)

Download PDF
(PC) Brackett v. Anderson et al Doc. 60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEMOND CHARLES BRACKETT, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:21-cv-02282-KJM-JDP (PC) v. ORDER WENDELL ANDERSON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a county inmate proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 19 by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 1, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 20 21 served on all parties and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the 23 findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 24 25 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 26 de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 27 by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 1, 2023, are adopted in full; 5 2. All other claims and defendants are dismissed without leave to amend for failure to 6 7 state a viable claim; and 3. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial 8 proceedings. 9 DATED: July 21, 2023. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.