(PC)Petillo v. Monique et al, No. 2:2021cv01996 - Document 13 (E.D. Cal. 2022)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 05/23/2022 ADOPTING 11 Findings and Recommendations in full. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Rodriguez, E)

Download PDF
(PC)Petillo v. Monique et al Doc. 13 Case 2:21-cv-01996-KJM-CKD Document 13 Filed 05/23/22 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DENNIS PETILLO, JR., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:21-cv-01996-KJM-CKD v. ORDER HELEN MONIQUE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 19 by28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On March 8, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 21 served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed a notice of 23 constitutional violations, which the court liberally construes as objections to the findings and 24 recommendations. 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 26 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 27 findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:21-cv-01996-KJM-CKD Document 13 Filed 05/23/22 Page 2 of 2 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 8, 2022, are adopted in full; 3 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); 4 5 6 and 3. The clerk of court is directed to close this case. DATED: May 23, 2022. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.