(PC) Cumby v. CDCR et al, No. 2:2021cv01897 - Document 4 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/8/2021 ORDERING the Clerk to assign a district judge to this case and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Cumby v. CDCR et al Doc. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EVAN CUMBY, Jr., 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:21-cv-1897 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION AND REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed October 26, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to file an application to 20 proceed in forma pauperis or pay the required filing fees within thirty days, and was cautioned 21 that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty 22 day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed 23 the required documents. 24 25 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 26 IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 27 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 28 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 2 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 3 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 4 failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 5 Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 6 Dated: December 8, 2021 7 8 9 /cumb1897.fifp 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
