(PC) Hill v. Danforth, No. 2:2021cv01709 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 05/23/22. DIRECTING the Clerk to randomly assign a District Judge. Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller added to case. It is further RECOMMENDED this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. New Case Number: 2:21-cv-1709 KJM DB (Licea Chavez, V)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM CLINTON HILL, 12 13 14 No. 2:21-cv-1709 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND PAUL DANFORTH, 15 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS Defendant. 16 17 A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal 18 service on March 16, 2022. It appears plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), 19 which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. 20 More than sixty-three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service 21 and plaintiff has failed to notify the Court of a current address. 22 23 24 25 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall assign a district judge to this case. In addition, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b). 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 28 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 1 1 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 2 and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen 3 days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 4 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 5 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 6 Dated: May 23, 2022 7 8 9 DLB7 hill1709.33a 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
