(PC) Johnson v. Covello et al, No. 2:2021cv01605 - Document 22 (E.D. Cal. 2022)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 09/21/2022 ADOPTING 21 Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING 14 Plaintiff's Motion to Cure Discrepancies as moot. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. CASE CLOSED. (Rodriguez, E)

Download PDF
(PC) Johnson v. Covello et al Doc. 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SEDRIC EUGENE JOHNSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:21-cv-01605-TLN-DMC ORDER v. P. COVELLO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 17 18 § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District 19 of California local rules. On March 22, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 21.) No 23 objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and the magistrate judge’s analysis. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 4 5 The Findings and Recommendations filed March 22, 2022 (ECF No. 21), are ADOPTED in full; 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders; 6 3. Plaintiff’s Motion to Cure Discrepancies (ECF No. 14) is DENIED as moot; and 7 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. 8 DATED: September 21, 2022 9 10 11 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.