(PC) McGowan v. Court, No. 2:2021cv01509 - Document 5 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/19/2021 ORDERING the Clerk to randomly assign a United StatesDistrict Judge to this case and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
(PC) McGowan v. Court Doc. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DERRICK McGOWAN, 12 No. 2:21-cv-1509-EFB P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 COURT, 15 ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 17 18 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 7, 2021, the court found that plaintiff had neither paid the filing 19 fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) nor requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 20 U.S.C. § 1915(a). ECF No. 3. Accordingly, the court directed plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or submit the 21 22 application required by § 1915(a). Id. The court also warned plaintiff that failure to do so would 23 result in this action being dismissed. Id. The time for acting has now passed and plaintiff has not 24 paid the filing fee, submitted another application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, or 25 otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to randomly assign a United States 26 27 District Judge to this case. 28 ///// Dockets.Justia.com 1 Further, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 2 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 3 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 4 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 5 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 6 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 7 objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 8 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 9 appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 10 v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 11 Dated: October 19, 2021. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.