(PC) Khademi v. South Placer County Jail et al, No. 2:2021cv01498 - Document 27 (E.D. Cal. 2022)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 06/28/22 ADOPTING 22 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 16 Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief. This matter is REFFERED back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings.(Licea Chavez, V)

Download PDF
(PC) Khademi v. South Placer County Jail et al Doc. 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVOOD KHADEMI, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:21-cv-1498 KJM DB P v. ORDER SOUTH PLACER CO. JAIL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. The matter 17 18 was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and 19 Local Rule 302. 20 On March 9, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 21 served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the 23 findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 24 25 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 26 de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 27 by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 9, 2022, are adopted in full; 5 2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief (ECF No. 16) is denied; and 6 3. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial 7 proceedings. 8 DATED: June 28, 2022. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.