(PS) Callum v. Austin Capital Bank, No. 2:2021cv01484 - Document 10 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/12/2021 RECOMMENDING that Plaintiff's claims be dismissed with prejudice and that the Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. Referred to District Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Huang, H)

Download PDF
(PS) Callum v. Austin Capital Bank Doc. 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GARLAND CALLUM, 12 No. 2:21-cv-01484-JAM-CKD PS Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AUSTIN CAPITAL BANK, 15 Defendant. 16 This case was removed to this court from state small claims court on August 18, 2021. 1 17 18 (ECF No. 1.) On August 25, 2021, defendant moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state 19 a claim, or in the alternative for a more definite statement under Federal Rule of Civil 20 Procedure 12(e). (ECF No. 6.) The court invited plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 21 21 days of the motion, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B), which would moot 22 defendant’s motion. (ECF No. 8.) However, plaintiff neither filed an amended complaint nor any 23 opposition to defendant’s motion. The court took the motion under submission, and on October 6, 24 2021, the court granted the motion and ordered plaintiff within 30 days to file an amended 25 complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal. (ECF No. 9 at 8.) The order warned that failure to 26 comply “will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed with prejudice for failure to 27 28 1 Because plaintiff is self-represented, the case is referred to the undersigned for all pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 636 and Local Rule 302(c)(21). 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 follow court orders, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).” (Id.) The 30-day deadline has passed without 2 receiving any filings from plaintiff. Accordingly, the undersigned recommends dismissing this 3 case with prejudice under Rule 41(b). 4 A district court may impose sanctions, including involuntary dismissal of a plaintiff’s case 5 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), where that plaintiff fails to prosecute his or her 6 case or fails to comply with the court’s orders, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or the court’s 7 local rules. See Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 44 (1991) (recognizing that a court 8 “may act sua sponte to dismiss a suit for failure to prosecute”); Hells Canyon Preservation 9 Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005) (approving sua sponte dismissals 10 under Rule 41(b)). 11 The court has weighed the five factors for determining whether to involuntarily dismiss a 12 case and finds that dismissal is warranted. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th 13 Cir. 1992). This case is being delayed by plaintiff’s failure to prosecute, and defendant is being 14 deprived of an opportunity to understand the claims against it and to prepare its defense. The 15 court has twice offered plaintiff opportunities to amend the complaint and move the case forward, 16 and each time plaintiff has failed to respond in any way. This leaves the court with little 17 alternative but to recommend dismissal. 18 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: 19 1. Plaintiff’s claims be DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 20 Procedure 41(b); and 21 2. The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. 22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 23 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen (14) days 24 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections 25 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections 26 to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections shall be served 27 on all parties and filed with the court within fourteen (14) days after service of the objections. The 28 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 2 1 appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 2 v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1156-57 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 Dated: November 12, 2021 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 19.call.1484 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.