(PC) Spearman v. Department of State Hospitals et al, No. 2:2021cv01280 - Document 18 (E.D. Cal. 2022)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 05/25/22 RECOMMENDING that his action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations.(Licea Chavez, V)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Spearman v. Department of State Hospitals et al Doc. 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 REGINALD EDWARD SPEARMAN, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:21-cv-1280 KJM CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS DEPARTMENT OF STATE HOSPITALS, et al., Defendants. 17 18 A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal 19 service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that 20 a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixty- 21 three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and plaintiff has 22 failed to notify the Court of a current address. 23 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen 2 days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 3 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 4 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 Dated: May 25, 2022 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 12/spea1280.33a.docx 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
