(HC) Purcaro v. C.H.C.F., No. 2:2021cv01230 - Document 10 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/29/2021 ADOPTING 9 Findings and Recommendations in full, DENYING 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus without prejudice to filing his claims in a new action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and DECLINING to issue a certificate of appealability. CASE CLOSED. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
(HC) Purcaro v. C.H.C.F. Doc. 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM CRAIG PURCARO, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:21-cv-01230-TLN-EFBP ORDER v. C.H.C.F. WARDEN, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 17 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 24, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 9.) Petitioner 23 has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 24, 2021, (ECF No. 9), are adopted in full; 2. Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied without prejudice to filing his claims in a new action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; 5 3. The Clerk is directed to close the case; and 6 4. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. 7 DATE: November 29, 2021 8 9 10 11 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.