(PC) Whitfield v. Smolich, No. 2:2021cv01218 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 11/24/2021 ADOPTING 5 Findings and Recommendations in full, DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Coll, A)
Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEWAZE LAXOTTER WHITFIELD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:21-cv-01218 WBS DB P v. ORDER SMOLICH, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 23, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which 20 21 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff has not filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 23, 2021 (ECF No. 5), are adopted 3 in full; 4 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice; and 5 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 6 Dated: November 24, 2021 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 /whit1218.800 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.