(PS) Conerly et al v. Yap et al, No. 2:2021cv01132 - Document 10 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/29/21 ADOPTING both 4 8 Findings and Recommendations in full DENYING 3 Ex Parte Application for sole legal and physical custody of minor daughter and DISMISSING action without leave to amend for failure to state a claim. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
(PS) Conerly et al v. Yap et al Doc. 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CARINA CONERLY, 12 No. 2:21-cv-01132-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER 13 14 15 v. JULIE G. YAP, et al., Defendants. 16 17 On July 26, 2021, and again on October 27, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and 18 recommendations (ECF Nos. 4, 8) in this matter which were served on Plaintiff and which 19 contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be 20 filed within fourteen days. On August 10, 2021 and on November 10, 2021, Plaintiff filed 21 objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF Nos. 5, 9.) 22 This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an 23 objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore 24 Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); see also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 25 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection 26 has been made, the court assumes its correctness and decides the matter on the applicable law. 27 See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Court reviews the magistrate 28 judge’s conclusions of law de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and concludes it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 26, 2021 (ECF No. 4) and the findings and recommendations filed October 27, 2021 (ECF No. 8) are both ADOPTED in full; 2. Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for an order granting sole legal and physical custody of minor daughter (ECF No. 3) is DENIED; 8 3. This action is dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a claim; and 9 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 10 DATE: November 29, 2021 11 12 13 14 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.