(PS) Rouse v. Beltran, No. 2:2021cv01085 - Document 9 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/20/2021 ADOPTING 7 Findings and Recommendations in full, DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP as moot and DISMISSING this action for failure to state a claim. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Rouse v. Beltran Doc. 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 XEZAKIA ROUSE, 12 No. 2:21–cv–1085–JAM–KJN PS Plaintiff, 13 ORDER v. 14 CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE,1 15 (ECF Nos. 2, 7) Defendant. 16 17 On November 16, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF 18 No. 7), which were served on the plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the 19 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. On November 29, 20 2021, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 8), which have 21 been considered by the court. This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an 22 23 objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore 24 Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); see also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 25 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection 26 27 1 The Clerk of Court is instructed to update the caption of the case on the court’s docket to reflect a change in the named defendant from Laura Beltran to the California Secretary of State. 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 has been made, the court assumes its correctness and decides the matter on the applicable law. 2 See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s 3 conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 4 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 5 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 6 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, 7 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 8 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 7) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 9 2. The action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); 10 3. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is DENIED as moot; and 11 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 12 13 14 15 Dated: December 20, 2021 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
