(PS) Expose v. US Bank National Association, No. 2:2021cv01036 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/29/2021 ADOPTING IN FULL 3 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP and DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE the 1 Complaint, because the court lacks jurisdiction and because it is duplicative of another case pending in this district. CASE CLOSED. (Tupolo, A)

Download PDF
(PS) Expose v. US Bank National Association Doc. 7 Case 2:21-cv-01036-JAM-AC Document 7 Filed 07/30/21 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LINDA ROSS EXPOSE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:21-cv-1036 JAM AC v. ORDER U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff proceeds in this action in pro per. The matter was referred to a United States 17 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On June 17, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 19 20 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 21 and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 3. On June 28, 2021, 22 plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 4. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:21-cv-01036-JAM-AC Document 7 Filed 07/30/21 Page 2 of 2 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 17, 2021, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is GRANTED but that the 4 complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice because the court lacks jurisdiction and 5 because it is duplicative of another case pending in this district. 6 7 8 9 DATED: July 29, 2021 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.