(PC) Stebbins v. San Joaquin County Jail Health Care Services Medical Staff et al, No. 2:2021cv01010 - Document 9 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/29/21 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a District Judge to this case. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days.(Plummer, M)

Download PDF
(PC) Stebbins v. San Joaquin County Jail Health Care Services Medical Staff et al Doc. 9 Case 2:21-cv-01010-JAM-KJN Document 9 Filed 07/29/21 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARK LAMONT STEBBINS, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:21-cv-1010 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY HEALTH CARE SERVICES MEDICAL STAFF, et al., Defendants. 17 18 By an order filed June 14, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma 19 pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement, and was cautioned 20 that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty- 21 day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed 22 the required documents. 23 24 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 25 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 28 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:21-cv-01010-JAM-KJN Document 9 Filed 07/29/21 Page 2 of 2 1 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 2 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 3 failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 4 Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 Dated: July 29, 2021 6 7 8 /steb1010.fifp 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.