(PC) Burton v. James et al, No. 2:2021cv00889 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2022)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/15/22 ADOPTING in full 11 Findings and Recommendations and DISMISSING this action with prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
(PC) Burton v. James et al Doc. 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KENDALL BURTON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:21-cv-00889-TLN-AC ORDER v. JAMES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 8, 2022, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein which 20 21 were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff has not filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued July 8, 2022 (ECF No. 11) are ADOPTED 3 4 5 in full, and 2. This matter is DISMISSED with prejudice. DATED: August 15, 2022 6 7 8 9 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.