(PS)Schembri v. Redding Police Department, No. 2:2021cv00742 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/4/2021 ADOPTING 6 Findings and Recommendations in full. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the Court's order. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
(PS)Schembri v. Redding Police Department Doc. 7 Case 2:21-cv-00742-TLN-AC Document 7 Filed 08/06/21 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KIMBERLY A. SCHEMBRI, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:21-cv-00742-TLN-AC Plaintiff, ORDER v. REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Kimberly A. Schembri (“Plaintiff”), an individual proceeding pro se, filed the 18 above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 Local Rule 302(c)(21). 20 On June 15, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff has not 23 filed timely objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 27 28 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:21-cv-00742-TLN-AC Document 7 Filed 08/06/21 Page 2 of 2 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed June 15, 2021 (ECF No. 6), are ADOPTED 3 4 5 6 7 IN FULL; and 2. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the Court’s order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 4, 2021 8 9 10 11 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.