(PC) James v. State of California et al, No. 2:2021cv00713 - Document 46 (E.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 12/1/2023 ADOPTING 45 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 40 Motion for Permanent Injunction. (Clemente Licea, O)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RONALD EUGENE JAMES, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:21-cv-00713-DJC-JDP (PC) v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a county inmate proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 18 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 30, 2023, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 20 21 recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice 22 that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within 23 fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to 25 be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS 26 HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 2 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 30, 2023, are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a permanent injunction, ECF No. 40, is denied. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 1, 2023 Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
