(PC) Cross v. Doe #1 John-Jane, et al, No. 2:2021cv00693 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/22/2021 ADOPTING in FULL 11 Findings and Recommendations. This action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, and failure to state a claim for the reasons set forth in the 4/30/2021 order, and the Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)

Download PDF
(PC) Cross v. Doe #1 John-Jane, et al Doc. 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 YOHAN CROSS, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:21-cv-00693-JAM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOHN-JANE DOE #1, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On November 8, 2021, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 22 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 27 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). 28 Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 the record and by the proper analysis. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 8, 2021, are adopted in full; 4 2. This action is dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, 5 6 and failure to state a claim for the reasons set forth in the April 30, 2021 order; and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. 7 8 9 Dated: December 22, 2021 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.