(HC)Smallwood v. Thompson, No. 2:2021cv00641 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/22/2021 ADOPTING in FULL 11 Findings and Recommendations. DENYING 2 Motion for Injunctive Relief. DENYING 8 Motion for an expedited hearing. This action is DISMISSED, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)

Download PDF
(HC)Smallwood v. Thompson Doc. 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN SMALLWOOD, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:21-CV-0641-JAM-DMC-P v. ORDER PAUL THOMPSON, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, who is proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas 17 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On November 3, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 20 21 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 22 objections within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations 23 have been filed. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 3, 2021, are adopted in 4 2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 9, is granted; 5 3. Petitioner’s motion for injunctive relief, ECF No. 2, is denied; 6 4. Petitioner’s motion for an expedited hearing, ECF No. 8, is denied; 7 5. This action is dismissed; and 8 6. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. 3 full; 9 10 11 Dated: December 22, 2021 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.