(PC) Foster v. Colombo, No. 2:2021cv00576 - Document 14 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/22/2021 ADOPTING in FULL 12 Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's complaint, ECF No. 1 , is DISMISSED without leave to amend, and the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close the case. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)

Download PDF
(PC) Foster v. Colombo Doc. 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARTIN LEE FOSTER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:21-cv-00576-JAM-JDP (PC) v. ORDER STEPHEN COLOMBO, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On October 19, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 1 24 25 26 27 28 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 1 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 19, 2021, are ADOPTED in full; 3 2. Plaintiff’s complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED without leave to amend; and 4 3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close the case. 5 6 7 Dated: November 22, 2021 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.