(HC) Gasner v. Matteson, No. 2:2021cv00453 - Document 8 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/30/21 ADOPTING in full 4 Findings and Recommendations and DISMISSING Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus. The court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
(HC) Gasner v. Matteson Doc. 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL GASNER, 12 No. 2:21-cv-0453-JAM-EFB P Petitioner, 13 v. 14 G. MATTESON, 15 ORDER Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 17 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 19, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 19, 2021, are adopted in full; 3 2. Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is summarily dismissed; 4 3. The Clerk is directed to close the case; and 5 4. The court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. 6 7 8 9 DATED: April 30, 2021 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.