(PC) Loveless v. Parole Authorities of the California Board of Parole Hearings, No. 2:2021cv00430 - Document 11 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 12/20/2021 ADOPTING 10 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING this action without prejudice for lack of prosecution and failure to state a claim. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL J. LOVELESS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. No. 2:21-CV-0430-WBS-DMC-P ORDER PAROLE AUTHORITIES OF THE CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, 16 Defendant. 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 18 19 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern 20 District of California local rules. On September 29, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 21 22 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 23 objections within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations 24 have been filed. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 26 supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 29, 2021, are adopted 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution and 3 4 5 6 7 in full; failure to state a claim; and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. Dated: December 20, 2021 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
