(HC) Metts-Montez v. Pallares, No. 2:2021cv00400 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/29/2021 ORDERING Clerk to assign a district judge to this case and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TRINITY METTS-MONTEZ, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:21-cv-0400 KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MICHAEL PALLARES, Respondents. 16 17 By an order filed March 15, 2021, petitioner was ordered to file an in forma pauperis 18 affidavit or to pay the appropriate filing fee, within thirty days, or this action would be dismissed. 19 The thirty-day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court’s order, has 20 not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit, and has not paid the appropriate filing fee. 21 22 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 23 IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written 27 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 28 Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the 1 1 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 2 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 Dated: April 29, 2021 4 5 /metts0400.hab 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.