(HC) Reilley v. Thompson, No. 2:2021cv00377 - Document 10 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 7/25/2021 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, and failure to comply with the court's local rules; and the Clerk of Court be directed to close the case. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Reilley v. Thompson Doc. 10 Case 2:21-cv-00377-TLN-JDP Document 10 Filed 07/26/21 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEFFREY REILLY, 12 13 14 15 16 Petitioner, v. PAUL THOMPSON, Case No. 2:21-cv-00377-TLN-JDP (HC) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS, AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES Respondent. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS 17 18 On May 11, 2021, respondent filed a motion to dismiss this case. ECF No. 8. In violation 19 of Local Rule 230(l), petitioner failed to timely file an opposition or statement of non-opposition 20 to respondent’s motion. Accordingly, on June 22, 2021, petitioner was ordered to show cause 21 within twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and 22 failure to comply with the court’s local rules. ECF No. 9. I notified petitioner that if he wished to 23 continue this lawsuit, he also needed to file, within twenty-one days, an opposition or statement 24 of non-opposition to respondent’s motion. Id. I warned him that failure to comply with the June 25 22 order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 26 27 The deadline has passed, and petitioner has not filed an opposition or statement of nonopposition to respondent’s motion nor otherwise responded to the June 22, 2021 order. 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:21-cv-00377-TLN-JDP Document 10 Filed 07/26/21 Page 2 of 2 1 Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that: 2 1. this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, 3 and failure to comply with the court’s local rules; and 4 2. the Clerk of Court be directed to close the case. 5 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 6 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 7 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 8 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 9 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 10 objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 11 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 12 appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 13 v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 Dated: 17 18 July 25, 2021 JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
